In resolution 2724 (2024), adopted with 14 votes in favour and one abstention (Russia), the Council also called on all parties to the conflict to seek a sustainable resolution to the fighting through dialogue.
Tweet URL
The conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) erupted in April last year in and around the capital. In the eleven months since, the fighting has spread, claiming thousands of lives, driven millions from their homes and plunged Sudan into a dire humanitarian crisis.
In the resolution, the Security Council expressed grave concern over the deteriorating humanitarian situation, including “crisis levels or worse” of acute food insecurity, particularly in the Darfur region, as well as ongoing reports of violations of international humanitarian and human rights laws, including cases of sexual violence in conflict.
It urged all parties to the conflict “to ensure the removal of any obstructions and enable full, rapid, safe and unhindered humanitarian access, including cross-border and crossline, and comply with their obligations under international humanitarian law, including to protect civilians and civilian objects, and their commitments under the Declaration of Commitment to Protect the Civilians of Sudan (‘Jeddah Declaration’).”
It also encouraged Ramtane Lamamra, the Secretary-General’s Personal Envoy, to use his good offices with the parties and Sudan’s neighbours, complementing and coordinating regional peace efforts.
Sudan Sanctions Panel of Experts
In another action on Friday, with 13 votes in favour and two abstentions (China and Russia), the Security Council renewed the mandate of the 1591 Sudan Sanctions Committee Panel of Experts, which expires next Tuesday, for a further year.
The panel was established on 29 March 2005 to assist the committee in monitoring the implementation of sanctions measures imposed by the Council (arms embargo, travel ban and assets freeze) on several armed groups and individuals in Sudan.
Simon Blake is an experienced journalist deeply interested in international affairs and global development. Having spent years reporting on humanitarian issues, he offers a unique perspective in his coverage of United Nations news.
Are there any specific measures outlined in the resolution to ensure the protection of civilians in Sudan?
Yes, the resolution emphasizes the importance of ensuring the protection of civilians in Sudan by urging all parties to comply with their obligations under international humanitarian law. It calls for the removal of any obstacles hindering humanitarian access and stresses the need to protect civilians and civilian objects. Let’s hope these measures lead to a safer and more secure environment for the people of Sudan.
In resolution 2724 (2024), adopted with 14 votes in favour and one abstention (Russia), the Council also called on all parties to the conflict to seek a sustainable resolution to the fighting through dialogue.
Is there any information on the response of the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces to the Security Council’s urgent plea to halt the fighting in Sudan?
As a journalist, I believe it is crucial for the Security Council to continue pushing for a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Sudan. The humanitarian crisis must be addressed with urgency, and all parties involved need to prioritize dialogue over violence. It’s heart-wrenching to witness the suffering of innocent civilians caught in the midst of this conflict.
As a humanitarian aid worker, I am deeply concerned about the ongoing conflict in Sudan. It is crucial for all parties involved to prioritize dialogue and work towards a sustainable resolution to prevent further loss of lives and alleviate the dire humanitarian crisis. The Security Council’s urgent plea is a step in the right direction, but more proactive efforts are needed to ensure humanitarian access and the protection of civilians.
As a longtime follower of international affairs, I believe it is crucial for all parties involved in the conflict in Sudan to prioritize dialogue over violence. The Security Council’s urgent plea and call for a sustainable resolution through peaceful means are commendable steps towards alleviating the dire humanitarian crisis in the region.
Does the resolution include any specific measures to address the root causes of the conflict and prevent further escalation?
It is crucial that all parties involved prioritize dialogue and seek a sustainable resolution to end the ongoing conflict in Sudan. The urgent humanitarian situation demands swift and efficient action to ensure the protection of civilians and facilitate humanitarian access to those in need.
Is there any information on the specific steps being taken to ensure safe humanitarian access in the conflict-affected areas as mentioned in the resolution?
As per resolution 2724 (2024), I believe all parties involved in the conflict in Sudan should engage in dialogue to find a sustainable solution. The humanitarian crisis, including acute food insecurity and reports of violations of human rights laws, needs urgent attention. It is crucial for all parties to allow swift and safe humanitarian access and protect civilians as per international humanitarian law.
Do you think the Security Council’s plea and resolution will have a significant impact on halting the fighting in Sudan?
Is there any indication of potential international intervention to stop the conflict in Sudan?
As an expert in international relations, I believe that it is crucial for all parties involved in the conflict in Sudan to prioritize dialogue as a means to achieve a sustainable resolution. The Security Council’s urgent plea to halt the fighting is commendable, but more concrete actions need to be taken to address the dire humanitarian crisis in the region. It is imperative for the parties to ensure full humanitarian access and comply with international humanitarian law to protect civilians. Collaboration and diplomatic efforts are key to bringing peace to Sudan.