“use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare in Gaza”, while also calling for an arms embargo on Israel.
In a resolution adopted by 28 votes in favour, six against and 13 abstentions, the 47-member Human Rights Council backed a call “to cease the sale, transfer and diversion of arms, munitions and other military equipment to Israel, the occupying Power…to prevent further violations of international humanitarian law and violations and abuses of human rights”.
Presented by Pakistan on behalf of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, delegates heard that the resolution had also been motivated by the need to stop “egregious” human rights violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Co-sponsors of the text included Bolivia, Cuba and the State of Palestine, ahead of the vote which saw support from more than two dozen countries including Brazil, China, Luxembourg, Malaysia and South Africa.
Unlike the UN Security Council, Human Rights Council resolutions are not legally binding on States but carry significant moral weight, and in this instance is intended to increase diplomatic pressure on Israel as well as potentially influence national policy decisions.
Tweet URL
Voices against
Among the delegations that either abstained or voted against the draft text, Germany noted that the resolution “refrains from mentioning Hamas and denies Israel the exercise of its right to self-defence”.
The German ambassador also objected to the draft resolution’s “prejudged” allegations “that Israel engages in apartheid, and it accuses Israel of collective punishment, deliberate targeting of the Palestinian civilian population and applying starvation as a method of warfare”.
For Israel, Meirav Eilon Shahar, Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva, rejected the resolution as further evidence of the Council’s alleged anti-Israeli bias. “According to this resolution, States should not sell arms to Israel in its endeavour to defend its population, but they continue to arm Hamas,” she said.
“It cannot even condemn the brutal murder of over 1,200 of my people, the kidnapping of over 240 individuals, including infants, the rape, mutilations and sexual abuse of Israeli women, girls and men,” the Israeli official said later to journalists on the sidelines of the Council.
The document condemns the use of explosive weapons with wide-area effects by Israel in populated areas in Gaza, underlining the “reverberating effects of such weapons on hospitals, schools, water, electricity and shelter, which are affecting millions of Palestinians”.
AI military use
The resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council also denounces the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to aid military decision making in conflict that may contribute to international crimes.
It decries the targeting of civilians, including on 7 October 2023, and demands the immediate release of all remaining hostages, persons arbitrarily detained and victims of enforced disappearance as well as ensuring immediate humanitarian access to the hostages and detainees in line with international law.
It was adopted on the last day of the latest session of the Council alongside the more traditional resolutions related to the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) on accountability and justice, Palestinians’ right to self-determination, Israeli settlements in the OPT and the occupied Syrian Golan.
Gaza crisis in focus
At the opening of the Council’s 55th session, the UN Secretary-General repeated his call for a humanitarian ceasefire and the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages.
“Nothing can justify [Hamas’s] deliberate killing, injuring, torturing and kidnapping of civilians, the use of sexual violence or the indiscriminate launching of rockets towards Israel,” said António Guterres. “But, nothing justifies the collective punishment of the Palestinian people.”
While presenting his latest report on justice and accountability in the OPT, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights called for an end to “carnage” in Gaza.
“Clear violations of international human rights and humanitarian laws, including war crimes and possibly other crimes under international law, have been committed by all parties. It is time – well past time – for peace, investigation and accountability,” said Volker Türk.
The Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, Francesca Albanese, also presented her latest report to the Council in which she stated that “there are reasonable grounds to believe that the threshold indicating the commission of the crime of genocide against Palestinians as a group in Gaza has been met.”
Emergency forum
The Human Rights Council addressed myriad grave human rights violations, including in Iran and Haiti. The Independent International Fact-Finding Mission investigating the protests in Iran, particularly concerning women and children, reported egregious violations by Iranian State authorities following the death of Jina Mahsa Amini in September 2022.
The Council renewed the mission’s mandate for another year as well as that of the Special Rapporteur monitoring human rights in Iran.
On Haiti, the Council received a lengthy update from the UN Human Rights Office, while High Commissioner Türk emphasised the urgent need for action amidst escalating violence, which has profoundly affected the population. The Council renewed the mandate of the expert on human rights in Haiti.
Renewals were also made for mandated investigations in Ukraine, Syria and South Sudan.
Addressing a range of thematic issues, the Council adopted a number of resolutions, including one encouraging States to combat discrimination, violence and harmful practices against intersex persons. Additionally, the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment was renewed, now reworded as “Special Rapporteur on the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment”, reflecting its recognition by the Council and the General Assembly.
Donate to the humanitarian response in Gaza
Garrett is a skilled author driven by a desire to illuminate global issues through his writing. With a foundation in journalism and international relations, he offers a distinctive viewpoint in his work, exploring the complexities of geopolitical events in depth.
Why are some countries still providing arms to Israel despite the human rights violations mentioned in the article?
Some countries continue to provide arms to Israel due to political alliances and economic interests that override humanitarian concerns.
Why is the Human Rights Council calling for an arms embargo on Israel? Isn’t that a drastic measure?
The Human Rights Council’s call for an arms embargo on Israel aims to prevent further violations of international humanitarian law and human rights abuses. It is a necessary step to stop the egregious violations happening in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Hey Israel, hands off! The use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare in Gaza must stop. I fully support the Human Rights Council’s call for an arms embargo on Israel. It’s time to prevent further violations of international humanitarian law and abuses of human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
As an advocate for human rights, I believe that the use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare in Gaza is a blatant violation of international humanitarian law. It is crucial for countries to heed the Human Rights Council’s call for an arms embargo on Israel to prevent further atrocities and safeguard human rights.
“I strongly believe that the use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare in Gaza is unacceptable. The Human Rights Council is right in calling for an arms embargo on Israel to prevent further violations of international humanitarian law. It is time to stop these egregious human rights violations and uphold the rights of the people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
As Emily91, I completely support the call for an arms embargo on Israel. The allegations of using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare in Gaza are deeply concerning. All countries must strive to uphold international humanitarian law and protect human rights. It’s crucial to take a stand against such violations and ensure accountability for any abuses. This resolution by the Human Rights Council is a significant step towards that goal.
As an advocate for human rights, I fully support the Human Rights Council’s call for an arms embargo on Israel to prevent further violations of international humanitarian law. It’s crucial to stop the use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare in Gaza. Diplomatic pressure is essential to ensure respect for human rights in the region.
It is unacceptable for any country to resort to the use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. The Human Rights Council’s call for an arms embargo on Israel is a necessary step to prevent further violations of international humanitarian law and abuses of human rights in Gaza.
Isn’t this approach quite drastic in handling the conflict situation in Gaza? What do you think are the potential consequences of imposing an arms embargo on Israel?