Тюрк выразил сожаление по поводу этого шага законодательных органов в бывшей британской колонии, которая является специальным административным районом Китая с 1997 года. По словам Верховного комиссара ООН по правам человека, законопроект с далекоидущими последствиями был принят в ускоренном порядке, несмотря на серьезные опасения по поводу того, что его положения противоречат международному праву.
Дополнительные преступления
По сообщениям международных СМИ, законопроект, известный в Гонконге как статья 23, законодательные органы обсуждали всего 11 дней.
Читайте также:
В ООН обеспокоены новым законом о национальной безопасности, принятие которого уже привело к арестам в Гонконге
Статья расширит Закон о защите национальной безопасности, который был принят в Китае в 2020 году. Будут добавлены пять дополнительных категорий преступлений, а именно государственная измена, мятеж, преступления, связанные с государственной тайной, шпионажем, саботажем и угрозами национальной безопасности, а также внешнее вмешательство.
Злоупотребление законом
Тюрк подчеркнул, что слишком широкие и расплывчатые положения законопроекта могут привести к криминализации действий, защищаемых международным правом. Речь идет о свободе выражения мнений и мирных собраний, а также о праве на получение и распространение информации.
«Такая двусмысленность вызывает серьезную обеспокоенность, учитывая потенциальные злоупотребления законом и его произвольное применение, в том числе в целях преследования инакомыслящих, журналистов, исследователей, представителей гражданского общества и правозащитников», – сказал он.
По словам Тюрка, подобные положения ведут к самоцензуре и ограничению законных высказываний и действий в отношении вопросов, представляющих общественный интерес, по которым открытое обсуждение имеет важнейшее значение.
Он добавил, что в связи с широким определением того, что представляет собой «внешнее вмешательство», закон может сказаться на взаимодействии с правозащитными организациями и органами ООН по правам человека.
«Принятие такого важного законопроекта, оказывающего значительное влияние на ситуацию с правами человека, без тщательного процесса обсуждения и содержательных консультаций является шагом назад для защиты прав человека в Гонконге», – отметил Верховный комиссар.
Garrett is a skilled author driven by a desire to illuminate global issues through his writing. With a foundation in journalism and international relations, he offers a distinctive viewpoint in his work, exploring the complexities of geopolitical events in depth.
Do you think the rushed adoption of the new security law in Hong Kong will have a significant impact on international relations?
As an avid follower of global politics, I believe the rushed adoption of the new security law in Hong Kong will undoubtedly strain international relations. The hasty decision-making process without sufficient deliberation raises concerns about compliance with international legal standards and respect for human rights. It is crucial for the international community to closely monitor the implications of this law and ensure that fundamental freedoms are upheld in the region.
Does rushing the new security law in Hong Kong violate international law according to the UN Human Rights Commissioner’s concerns?
Yes, the rushed passing of the new security law in Hong Kong indeed raises valid concerns about potential violations of international law. The UN Human Rights Commissioner’s worries about the far-reaching implications of the legislation are justified, as the ambiguous provisions could lead to the criminalization of actions protected by international law, such as freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. It is crucial to address these issues seriously to prevent abuse and ensure the protection of fundamental rights.
The rushed passing of the new Hong Kong security law is concerning. The UN’s top rights advocate criticized the legislative body’s move in the former British colony, now a special administrative region of China since 1997. According to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the bill with far-reaching consequences was adopted hastily, despite serious concerns that its provisions contradict international law. There are fears that the law could criminalize actions protected by international law, such as freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and access to information.
The rushed passage of the new Hong Kong security law is deeply concerning. The vague provisions in the legislation could lead to the criminalization of actions protected by international law, such as freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, as well as the right to access and disseminate information. This ambiguity raises serious concerns, considering the potential abuses of the law and its arbitrary enforcement, including for the persecution of dissenters and journalists.
The rushed passage of the new security law in Hong Kong is deeply concerning. The UN human rights commissioner’s remarks highlight the serious implications of this law, which was pushed through despite international legal concerns. The vague provisions of the law risk criminalizing activities protected by international law, such as freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. This ambiguity raises significant alarm about potential law abuses and arbitrary enforcement, including targeting dissenting voices, journalists, and activists.
The Turk expressed regret about this legislative step in the former British colony, which has been a special administrative region of China since 1997. According to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the bill with far-reaching consequences was rushed through, despite serious concerns that its provisions are in conflict with international law. Additional crimes According to international media reports, the bill, known in Hong Kong as Article 23, was discussed by legislative bodies for only 11 days. It will expand the National Security Law, which was enacted in China in 2020. Five additional categories of offenses will be added, namely state subversion, rebellion, crimes related to state secrets, espionage, sabotage, threats to national security, and external interference. Misuse of the law The Turk emphasized that the overly broad and vague provisions of the bill may lead to the criminalization of actions protected by international law. This concerns freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, as well as the right to seek and disseminate information. “Such ambiguity is deeply concerning, given the potential for abuse of the law and its arbitrary enforcement, including for the persecution of dissenters, journalists…
The rush to pass the new Hong Kong security law is a concerning step back in terms of upholding international law and human rights. The broad and vague provisions of the bill could lead to the criminalization of actions protected by international law, such as freedom of speech and peaceful assembly. This ambiguity raises serious concerns about potential abuses and arbitrary enforcement of the law, including targeting dissenting voices and journalists.
Do you think the rush to pass this new law reflects a disregard for international law and human rights concerns?
As a journalist with experience in covering human rights issues, I believe the hasty passage of this law indeed demonstrates a blatant disregard for international legal standards and fundamental human rights. The rush to implement such far-reaching legislation without proper consideration and consultation is deeply concerning and raises serious questions about the commitment to upholding human rights in Hong Kong.
The rush to pass the new Hong Kong security law is deeply concerning. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights expressed regret over this legislative move in the former British colony, which has been a special administrative region of China since 1997. The bill with far-reaching consequences was adopted hastily, despite serious concerns that its provisions contradict international law. The ambiguities in the bill might lead to the criminalization of actions protected by international law, such as freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. This ambiguity raises serious concerns due to the potential for law abuse and arbitrary enforcement, including the persecution of dissenting voices and journalists.
The rush to pass the new security law in Hong Kong is truly concerning. The UN rights advocate expressed regret over this legislative move in the former British colony, now a special administrative region of China since 1997. According to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the far-reaching bill was pushed through despite serious concerns that its provisions contradict international law. The draft law, known in Hong Kong as Article 23, was reportedly debated for only 11 days by the legislative bodies. The expansion of the National Security Law, adding five new crime categories such as state subversion, sedition, crimes related to state secrets, espionage, sabotage, threats to national security, and external interference, raises alarms. Too broad and vague, the provisions may lead to the criminalization of actions protected by international law, including freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and the right to access and disseminate information. This ambiguity is deeply troubling, considering the potential abuses of the law and its arbitrary enforcement, possibly targeting dissenting voices and journalists.
The rushed passing of the new Hong Kong security law is deeply concerning. The broad provisions of the bill could lead to the criminalization of actions protected by international law, such as freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. This ambiguity raises serious alarm considering the potential for law abuse and arbitrary application, including targeting dissenters, journalists.